Some Pending Cases
Class action lawsuit alleges popular baby care and cosmetic products contain harmful ingredients. Defendants include Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., L’Oreal USA, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation, CVS/Caremark Corporation, and Target Corporation.
|
|
Read more... |
This nationwide class action filed by Litigation Law Group against Capital One alleges the credit card bank failed to keep its promise of a "low" "fixed" APR and unilaterally raised customers' credit card rates--often by as many as 10 APR points.
|
|
Read more... |
|
|
Suit Alleges Baby Products Contain Carcinogens |
|
Herrington et al. v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. et al. – Nationwide class action is brought against Defendants Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc., L’Oreal USA, Inc., Kimberly-Clark Corporation, CVS/Caremark Corporation, and Target Corporation, on behalf of consumers who purchased Defendants' baby care and cosmetic products containing 1,4-dioxane, formaldehyde and other potentially harmful ingredients.
In a February 2007 press release, the non-profit organization Campaign For Safe Cosmetics published a press release entitled “Cancer-Causing Chemical FoundIn Children’s Bath Products” in which it was reported that laboratory testing had revealed the presence of 1,4-dioxane in various baby products including JOHNSON’S® Head-To-Toe® Baby Wash.
Further investigation revealed that other popular baby cosmetic and cleansing products contained 1,4-dioxane and/or formaldehyde, both recognized carcinogens, including JOHNSON’S® Baby Shampoo, AVEENO® Baby™ Soothing Relief Creamy Wash, L’Oreal Kids Fast Dry 2-in-1 Shampoo With a Burst of Cool Melon, HUGGIES® Naturally Refreshing Cucumber & Green Tea Baby Wash, HUGGIES® Soft Skin Shea Butter Baby Wipes, and CVS® Baby Shampoo.
The complaint alleges causes of action including for violations of California Business and Professions Code section 17200, et seq., violations of the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1750, et seq., intentional misrepresentation, negligent misrepresentation, and fraudulent omission/suppression.
|
|
More Pending Cases
-
Class action brought on behalf of buyers of the Gateway XHD3000 30-inch LCD monitor alleges monitor is defective and will not perform as advertised.
|
|
Read more... |
Class action filed 11/26/08 by Litigation Law Group, alleges Apple misrepresented data speeds for the 3G version of the iPhone; and that users of the new iPhone experienced loss of functionality in 3G mode.
|
|
Read more... |
Nation-wide class action filed 7/27/09 on behalf of Facebook advertisers alleges that advertisers were forced to pay for non-existent or fraudulent clicks, unlawfully increasing Facebook's revenues.
|
|
Read more... |
Class action filed 1/27/09 alleges Netflix and Walmart conspired to divide between them the markets for sales of new DVDs and online rental of DVDs, stifling competition and injuring consumers. |
|
Read more... |
|